CO129-529-4 China- extraterritoriality 23-11-1931 - 31-12-1931 — Page 165

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All

This Document is the Property of His Britannic Majesty's Government, and should be returned to the Foreign Office if not required for official use.]

165

From CHINA

Decypher.

Sir M. Lampson (Nanking)

30th March 1931.

D.

5.40 p.m.

30th March 1931.

R.

3.10 p.m.

30th March 1931.

No. 87.

(On Tour).

IMMEDIATE.

Very Confidential.

Extraterritoriality.

The time having come to place the cards on the

table, I saw Minister for Foreign Affairs alone this

morning and told him that if he would meet us on re-

served areas I could practically promise him criminal

jurisdiction subject to necessary detailed safeguards

regarding arrest, imprisonment etc.

2.

He replied by saying that attitude of Central

political council was definite - no cojudges, no criminal

jurisdiction, no reserved areas. He would be especially

frank: if they met us on our four reserved areas

(Shanghai, Tientsin, Canton and Hankow) the ground would

be cut from under their feet in meeting forthcoming

Japanese demand for reserved areas in Manchuria to which

they could never agree. He knew that we had no

ulterior motives and that our whole policy was a bona

fide trade policy no one suspected us of political

designs; but his government had to be extremely careful

of doing anything which weakened their case vis a vis

Japan.

3. I argued that on the contrary to give us a few

areas would .trengthen his hands. No one could

ribute any special political interest to those areas.

Moreover to give us them would ensure that we carried

British

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.